Criminal Objectives Integrality in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System

  • Ahmad Rofiq University of Diponegoro, Indonesia
  • Hari Sutra Disemadi University of Diponegoro, Indonesia
  • Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya University of Diponegoro, Indonesia

Abstract

The integrality of the criminal justice system must be realized in every aspect of sub-systems, in substance, structure, and legal culture. In this respect, in the process of criminal justice, the three sub-systems’ integrality are required so that the criminal justice system is capable to produce fair legal decisions in the process of law enforcement in Indonesia. Until such a policy is undertaken, the law will always be harsh against the poor and weak against the rich. This paper discusses criminal objectives integrality in Indonesian criminal justice system and its influence in the integrated criminal justice system. Using a normative juridical method, this paper demonstrates that each sub-system of criminal justice (the Police, Prosecutors, Courts, and the prison) is in line with the main objectives of criminal law enforcement as found in various laws that govern the institutions.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals
Ablisar, Madiasa. “Relevansi Hukuman Cambuk Sebagai Salah Satu Bentuk Pemidanaan Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 2 (2014): 278–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.296.

Anjari, Warih. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Widya Yustisia 1, no. 2 (2015): 107–15. http://e-journal.jurwidyakop3.com/index.php/yustisia/article/view/208.

Apriani, Luh Rina. “Penerapan Filsafat Pemidanaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Yudisial 3, no. 1 (2010): 1–14. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v3i1.11.

Bakhri, Syaiful. “Pengaruh Aliran-Aliran Falsafat Pemidanaan Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 18, no. 1 (2011): 136–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss1.art8.

Gunarto, Marcus Priyo. “Sikap Memidana Yang Berorientasi Pada Tujuan Pemidanaan.” Mimbar Hukum 21, no. 1 (2009): 93–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16248.

Huda, Chairul. “Kedudukan Subsistem Kepolisian Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal 6, no. 12 (1999): 134–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol6.iss12.art12.

Ishaq. “Sanksi Pidana Pembunuhan Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam Sebagai Kontribusi Bagi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Al-Risalah 16, no. 1 (2016): 33–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v16i01.334.

Kholiq, M Abdul, and Ari Wibowo. “Penerapan Teori Tujuan Pemidanaan Dalam Perkara Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan: Studi Putusan Hakim.” Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal 23, no. 2 (2016): 186–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art2.

Lasmadi, Sahuri. “Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 5 (2011): 1–10. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/jimih/article/view/530.

Luthan, Salman. “Dialektika Hukum Dan Moral Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 19, no. 4 (2012): 506–23. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol19.iss4.art2.

Rumadan, Ismail. “Problem Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia Dan Reorientasi Tujuan Pemidanaan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 2, no. 2 (2013): 263–76. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/JHP.2.2.2013.263-276.

Wahyuni, Fitri. “Sanksi Pidana Pemerkosaan Terhadap Anak Menurut Hukum Pidana Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam.” Media Hukum 23, no. 1 (2016): 96–109. http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1965.

Books
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Reformasi Sistem Peradilan (Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2017.

Effendy, Marwan. Kejaksaan RI: Posisi Dan Fungsinya Dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005.

Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1994.

Muladi dan Arief, Barda Nawawi. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2005.

Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.

Muladi. Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni, 2002.

Negara, Satochid Karta. Hukum Pidana Bagian Satu. Jakarta: Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, 1998.

Prakoso, Djoko. Hukum Penistesier di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.

Samosir, Djisman. Fungsi Pidana Penjara dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Bandung: Bina Cipta, 1992.

Warassih, Esmi. Pranata Hukum: Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2016.

Laws
Law No. 2 of 2002.

Law No. 16 of 2004.

Law No. 48 of 2009.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Published
2019-12-16
How to Cite
ROFIQ, Ahmad; DISEMADI, Hari Sutra; PUTRA JAYA, Nyoman Serikat. Criminal Objectives Integrality in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Al-Risalah, [S.l.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 179-190, dec. 2019. ISSN 2540-9522. Available at: <http://e-journal.lp2m.uinjambi.ac.id/ojp/index.php/al-risalah/article/view/458>. Date accessed: 01 apr. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v19i2.458.
Section
Articles